03 January 2007 by Published in: Civil War books and authors 8 comments

When I was working on my study of the fighting on East Cavalry Field at Gettysburg, I came across a tantalizing little tidbit. It has intrigued me for a long time, and it was, until last night, a source of great frustration for me.

If you look at the report of George A. Custer that’s included in volume 27 of the Official Records of the Civil War, it contains little useful information and is really only an itinerary of the Michigan Cavalry Brigade. The same thing is true of the reports of the regimental commanders of Michigan Brigade. I think I know why. Custer’s personal possessions, including all of his papers, were captured at Trevilian Station in June 1864, and it’s possible that his actual report of the East Cavalry Field was lost.

Most of the regimental reports were actually published in an article by a correspondent of the New York Times named E. A. Paul in August 1863, and those can be found. However, it doesn’t appear that the portions published in Paul’s article are the entire reports, but rather pieces of them.

A teasing, tantalizing tidbit of a more detailed report can be found in an earlier biography of Custer, by Frederick Whittaker. It’s only a portion of this report, and there are no clues where the rest of it might be found. I spent several years searching for the thing, and had to content myself with the fragment when I did my study of East Cavalry Field. I published the fragment as an appendix to one of my two volumes of the writings of Bvt. Brig. Gen. James H. Kidd of the 6th Michigan Cavalry.

I actually gave up on finding the thing, and never figured I would find it. Until last night.

Last night, I was looking at some of my materials to cobble together one of my profiles of forgotten Union cavalrymen, and I pulled down the reprint of John Robertson’s Michigan in the War, a book published by the State of Michigan to commemorate its contributions to the Union victory in the Civil War. Each regiment and battery raised by Michigan has a brief history included in the book, and there is one for the Michigan Cavalry Brigade. When I looked at the entry for the Michigan Cavalry Brigade last night, what did I find? The full report by Custer, as well as the full reports of the commanders of the four regiments of the brigade. Never mind that I’ve owned a copy of this book for about five years. Never mind also that I’ve looked at parts of it extensively. I just never bothered to look at the section on the Michigan Brigade.

So, there it was, hiding right in front of my eyes, right there in my own library, just waiting to be found. It was, of course, totally fortuitous that I found it, as I really wasn’t looking for it at all. So far as I know, no modern treatment of the fighting on East Cavalry Field has ever used the entire report, and none have used the detailed reports of the regimental commanders. Certainly, Carhart didn’t use this material when he failed to do thorough research in writing his intellectually dishonest, festering pile of turds.

So, in the hope of promoting the public interest and making sure that this information is, in fact, made generally available, for the next several days, I will be using this blog to post these five reports verbatim here. Stay tuned. I hope you will find them interesting.

Scridb filter

Comments

  1. Lanny Thomas Tanton
    Thu 04th Jan 2007 at 2:41 am

    Dear Eric,
    I look forward to reading Custer’s report. Aren’t we glad we have libraries, even if we don’t always understand what gold we already possess! Will this additional material make it into your projected 3 volume work on Gettysburg?

    Best wishes always,

    Lanny

  2. Thu 04th Jan 2007 at 10:56 am

    Lanny,

    Indeed we are.

    Yes, that information will make its way into the new set. So far as I know, nobody’s used it previously, so it will be good stuff.

    Eric

  3. Dave Kelly
    Thu 04th Jan 2007 at 11:11 am

    That’s amazing.

    There are a lot of holes in the OR. Been trying to do work on Union Mobilization sporadically over the years. Except for JB Fry’s papers in Section 2 there is little of value in the OR.

    Look forward to their posting.

  4. Thu 04th Jan 2007 at 12:23 pm

    When Eric called me about the find last night, I was pretty stunned. I too grabbed my copy of Robertson (which I’ve also had for about 5 years) and saw the reports. What’s funny (or tragic) is that I used quotes from some of the regimental reports for our joint book Plenty of Blame to Go Around (specifically on the Hanover battle chapters). The page right after Col. Gray’s report is Custer’s full report. Sheesh.

    I probably saw it but didn’t realize what it was. Gold right at your fingertips, and you don’t even know it!

    J.D. Petruzzi

  5. Stan O'Donnell
    Thu 04th Jan 2007 at 12:29 pm

    That is wonderful news!

    In the preface of A. B. Isham’s 1893 Seventh Michigan Cavalry historical sketch (Blue Acorn Press, 2000 edition), he mentions using the “very incomplete official reports mentioned in ‘Michigan in the War’,… “. I never gave it a second thought. I’d read Custer’s ECF OR/glorified mini-timeline Chronology numerous times and was always left craving for more.

    The great thing is that I’m hoping to be at my cavernous tin can domecile on East Cav Field for the next few days. Being able to read these reports for the first time while actually on the very ground covered within, will truly be a treat. Keep up the fabulous work Eric!

    Gratefully,
    Stan

  6. Thu 04th Jan 2007 at 12:30 pm

    JD and Stan,

    Exactly right. Like I said, sometimes, things hide in plain sight.

    Eric

  7. John B. Lundstrom
    Thu 04th Jan 2007 at 11:19 pm

    I think there might be more such gold in state adjutant general records, published and unpublished. For the 9th Minnesota at Brice’s Crossroads (I’m finishing a book on the 9th Minnesota), for example, the ORs contain only a brief statement of strength and losses, but Vol. II of “Minnesota in the Civil and Indian Wars” (the Minnesota equivalent to Robertson) has the lengthy battle report that Lt.Col. Josiah Marsh submitted to the adjutant general in St. Paul. Surprisingly this report didn’t make it into the Supplemental ORs. So far as I can tell, no extensive printed account of that battle has ever used this invaluable comprehensive report.

    Best wishes,
    John Lundstrom

  8. Fri 05th Jan 2007 at 3:24 pm

    John,

    Great point–thanks for passing that along.

    It only points out what a lousy job the Broadfoot people did in putting together the OR Supplements. Instead of wasting 40 volumes on itineraries, they should have been more thorough in finding stuff like this.

    Eric

Comments are closed.

Copyright © Eric Wittenberg 2011, All Rights Reserved
Powered by WordPress