08 April 2008 by Published in: General News 9 comments

From today’s USA Today:

Civil war soldiers’ bodies secretly exhumed

ALBUQUERQUE (AP) — Working in secret, federal archaeologists have dug up the remains of dozens of soldiers and children near a Civil War-era fort after an informant tipped them off about widespread grave-looting.

The exhumations, conducted from August to October, removed 67 skeletons from the parched desert soil around Fort Craig — 39 men, two women and 26 infants and children, according to two federal archaeologists who helped with the dig.

They also found scores of empty graves and determined 20 had been looted.

The government kept its exhumation of the unmarked cemetery near the historic New Mexico fort out of the public’s eye for months to prevent more thefts.

The investigation began with a tip about an amateur historian who had displayed the mummified remains of a black soldier, draped in a Civil War-era uniform, in his house.

Investigators say the historian, Dee Brecheisen, may have been a prolific looter who spotted historical sites from his plane. Brecheisen died in 2004 and although it was not clear whether the looting continued after his death, authorities exhumed the unprotected site to prevent future thefts.

“As an archaeologist, you want to leave a site in place for preservation … but we couldn’t do that because it could be looted again,” Jeffery Hanson, of the Bureau of Reclamation, told The Associated Press.

The remains are being studied by Bureau of Reclamation scientists, who are piecing together information on their identities. They will eventually be reburied at other national cemeteries.

Most of the men are believed to have been soldiers — Fort Craig protected settlers in the West from American Indian raids and played a role in the Civil War. Union troops stationed there fought the Confederacy as it moved into New Mexico from Texas in 1862.

The children buried there may have been local residents treated by doctors at the former frontier outpost, officials said.

Federal officials learned of the looting in November 2004, when Don Alberts, a retired historian for Kirtland Air Force Base, tipped them off about a macabre possession he’d seen at Brecheisen’s home about 30 years earlier.

Alberts described seeing the mummified remains of a black soldier with patches of brown flesh clinging to facial bones and curly hair on top of its skull. Alberts said the body had come from Fort Craig.

“The first thing we did was laughed because who would believe such a story,” Hanson said. “But then we quickly decided we better go down and check it out.”

Weeks later, Hanson and fellow archaeologist Mark Hungerford surveyed the cemetery site and found numerous holes — evidence of unauthorized digging.

While records show the cemetery had been disinterred twice by the Army in the late 1800s, it wasn’t known how many bodies remained. Hanson said ground-penetrating radar revealed the Army left behind about one-third of the bodies.

A lack of funding and various federal procedures delayed the excavation until last summer.

Brecheisen’s son told authorities where the mummified remains from his father’s home were, and a person who hasn’t been publicly identified handed over a more-than-century-old skull packaged in a brown paper bag. Alberts said that skull, which still had hair attached, was the one he’d seen years earlier.

Authorities also found some Civil War and American Indian artifacts in Brecheisen’s home, but the display rooms that showcased Brecheisen’s collections had already been emptied out and auctioned off by his family after his death, Hanson said.

Investigators believe Brecheisen did most of his looting alone, but they also know he dug with close friends and family at the Fort Craig site. Some who accompanied him led authorities to the grave sites, Hanson said.

Brecheisen was a decorated Vietnam veteran and flew for the Air National Guard during a 26-year military career. His family described him as “one of the state’s foremost preservationists of historical facts and sites” in his obituary.

Those close to Brecheisen said his looting may have been motivated by anger toward the Bureau of Land Management, but no further details were available. Alberts described him as a collector; it wasn’t clear whether Brecheisen sold any of the items.

Investigators believe he also dug up grave sites in Fort Thorn and Fort Conrad in southern New Mexico as well as prehistoric American Indian burial sites in the Four Corners region.

Hungerford said they also believe he may have taken the Fort Craig burial plot map, which is missing from the National Archives.

The criminal case against Brecheisen was closed upon his death and there are no plans to investigate his family members, assistant U.S. Attorney Mary McCulloch said.

Alberts said he asked Brecheisen to come clean.

“I had urged him to simply return the remains, about 10, 15 years before he got ill. I offered to act as an honest broker to the deal and see that they were returned, but I didn’t get a response,” Alberts said. “I didn’t want to get a friend in trouble.”

He added: “But you look back and think you would have done everything differently if you would have known everything was going to disappear.”

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

There just aren’t a lot of things lower than grave robbing. Kudos to the folks showing respect for these poor, departed souls.

Scridb filter


  1. Dave Powell
    Wed 09th Apr 2008 at 6:45 am

    Amateur Historian? Not hardly. Psychotic ghoul seems a more apt description…

  2. Wed 09th Apr 2008 at 8:21 am

    The punishment for such acts, aside from time in a correctional facility is at least two years of community service – cleaning bird leavings from cannons, monuments and markers on the battlefields, with a tooth brush and distilled water only.

  3. Ken Noe
    Wed 09th Apr 2008 at 9:42 am

    Sadly, I’ve run across stories like this for years. The only thing that surprises me is that he wasn’t selling the artifacts on E-Bay like all the rest.

  4. dan
    Wed 09th Apr 2008 at 11:32 pm

    >The investigation began with a tip about an amateur historian who had displayed the mummified remains of a black soldier, draped in a Civil War-era uniform, in his house

    Vile, despicable, disgusting. I could go on, of course. There is nothing the “historian” about that individual. Grave robbing and displaying of the dead is something of an illness, a mania. It’s utterly revolting. Use of the term “amateur historian” in this context is a disservice to everyone interested in history. Yech.

  5. Mike Peters
    Thu 10th Apr 2008 at 1:23 pm

    “Federal officials learned of the looting in November 2004, when Don Alberts, a retired historian for Kirtland Air Force Base, tipped them off about a macabre possession he’d seen at Brecheisen’s home about 30 years earlier.”


    The question I have is why didn’t Alberts notify the authorities in 1974? Don’t buy his “I didn’t want to get a friend in trouble” answer.


  6. Don
    Thu 10th Apr 2008 at 2:47 pm


    Your comments on grave-robbers are of course right on the money. I wonder if the Don Alberts mentioned is the author of the Wesley Merritt biography.


  7. Mike Peters
    Thu 10th Apr 2008 at 5:09 pm

    I believe you are right. And, IIRC, Don (E.) Alberts also co-authored a book on Glorietta Pass.


  8. tomrod
    Fri 11th Apr 2008 at 10:10 am

    I guess this makes Mr. Brecheisen, to quote from the fine film “Gangs of New York”, a “Fiddlin’ Bens”.


  9. Tue 11th Sep 2012 at 6:09 pm

    Mr. Leo,

    Since you chose to (a) use inappropriate language and (b) used your comment to launch a personal attack on another poster, your comment has been deleted.

    This is your one warning. Obey the rules–there are only three, and the primary one is to be cordial and respectful of other posters here–or your IP address will be banned.

    And let’s be quite clear about this: I make the rules. I am the sole arbiter of those rules. This is not a democracy. Therefore, my decisions about those rules are not subject to discussion and there is no right of appeal. If you don’t like my rules, you are free not to return to the site. If you do, you will obey the rules, or you will be banned permanently.

    I trust that I have made myself abundantly clear.

    Eric J. Wittenberg
    Site owner

Add comment


Copyright © Eric Wittenberg 2011, All Rights Reserved
Powered by WordPress

Warning: substr() expects parameter 3 to be long, string given in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/footer.php on line 54