That’s a valid point, and I appreciate your raising it. Apparently, the thought is to preserve that which is preservable–if there’s nothing left of the field, evidently someone felt that it was a better use of those scarce funds for a battlefield that was still intact.

Eric

To give just one example, several years ago I discovered that a very small, pristine (about 3 acres) piece of land was for sale that was a core part of the all-but-destroyed Chantilly battlefield. It was about a 1/4 mile away from all that officially remains of that battlefield, which is only 4.5 acres to begin with. The parcel in question was on the Ox Hill ridgeline right at the spot where the 21st Massachusetts lost over 100 men in a single volley from Confederates hidden at the top of the ridge. To this day, the occassional bullet or button is still found on that undeveloped ground.

Yet, the various organizations I contacted seemed disinterested, pointing out that Chantilly was now a fragmented battlefield and that land was still available at better known places.

Admittedly, that field was close to my heart due to the book I had written on the battle, and without a doubt the land was quite pricey being in northern Va. I was certainly not an objective advocate. Nevertheless, the speed with which many dismissed my information was surprising.

Paul Taylor

My point precisely. And if you need a contrast, take a look at Antietam, which is still largely unspoiled by the commercial pollution that plagues Gettysburg.

And thanks for your kind words. They’re much appreciated.

Eric