id was set in the arguments array for the "side panel" sidebar. Defaulting to "sidebar-1". Manually set the id to "sidebar-1" to silence this notice and keep existing sidebar content. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 4.2.0.) in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4239id was set in the arguments array for the "footer" sidebar. Defaulting to "sidebar-2". Manually set the id to "sidebar-2" to silence this notice and keep existing sidebar content. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 4.2.0.) in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4239I think those are excellent books certainly some of the best that Longacre has yet written. His bibliography in these books are chocked full of primary and secondary sources but he did not use all of them in the text as evidenced by going over the endnotes of the books. So he has a incredible bibliography but just used a core of sources for his text.
Chris
]]>If a book doesn’t have them I don’t think it automatically makes them worthless. As a poster says above I think Footnotes and Endnotes are the key things to have.
For example, Holzer’s book on Lincoln as President elect does not have a bibliography but it is extensively endnoted. I think that the book is still a excellent look at this time period and I definitely still enjoy reading and using it despite the lack of a bibliography but I can understand how frustrating it is not to have one.
Chris
]]>Any rant that contains a reference to Carhart’s “festering pile of turds” is pretty good in and of itself. Keep up the good work General!
]]>Spot on Hoss!
]]>