id was set in the arguments array for the "side panel" sidebar. Defaulting to "sidebar-1". Manually set the id to "sidebar-1" to silence this notice and keep existing sidebar content. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 4.2.0.) in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4239id was set in the arguments array for the "footer" sidebar. Defaulting to "sidebar-2". Manually set the id to "sidebar-2" to silence this notice and keep existing sidebar content. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 4.2.0.) in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4239FWIW I was talking to someone associated with the mainstream publishing industry who said that as far as the big boys are concerned, the CW market is Gettysburg, Antietam, and Abe Lincoln. That’s what they think they can sell, so that’s what they buy, from big names.
]]>Please tell that relatively unknown author that it’s about time. 🙂
Eric
]]>Also, I think he is visiting your CWRT this fall 😉
JFE
]]>I’ve heard about Kyle’s work as well, and I’m looking forward to it.
Thanks, and good luck with your current projects.
A.P.
]]>I quite agree with you about Price’s Raid. As JD said, we’re working on it.
I do understand that Prof. Kyle Sinisik of The Citadel is also working on a study of Price’s Raid. I know Kyle and know him to be a diligent historian.
Eric
]]>Eric and I have actually been gathering an enormous amount of primary material on Price’s Raid, much of it never used before. Very obscure stuff. We first became interested in the topic through the Pleasonton connection, but then became very interested in the entire subject.
Not sure if or when we will actually tackle it (Eric and I both have several separate projects in the fire, and our three-volume study of the cavalry in the Gettysburg Campaign to work on) but it’s one for which we have a good start on the material.
J.D.
]]>