So I think you’re correct in suggesting that the Wal-Mart, for instance, might meet local needs and desires, but might actually decrease tourist appeal and the ability of the local economy to bring in outside money. If part of the essence and story of a place is that once an important battle, in a civil war pitting American against American, was fought here, it’s hard to see what “development” might be worth destroying that sense of a community’s distinctive identity.

Yes, large proportions of a few states would all be a park if we preserved every known Civil War battlefield, but I do think it’s practical to preserve what already is in public ownership, and to protect its edges from unseemly and discordant development.

I didn’t make note of it because it’s totally and completely irrelevant to the issue at hand.

And contemporary politics and the bashing of the present administration are not appropriate here, nor are they welcome. I would appreciate it if you would please cease and desist. Thank you.

PS I donate the the CWPT.