Notice: Undefined index: sb_uploaded_file in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/plugins/spammer-blocker/spammer-blocker.php on line 31

Notice: Use of undefined constant wp_scribd_activation - assumed 'wp_scribd_activation' in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/plugins/wp-scribd/wp-scribd.php on line 197

Notice: Use of undefined constant wp_scribd_deactivation - assumed 'wp_scribd_deactivation' in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/plugins/wp-scribd/wp-scribd.php on line 198

Notice: register_sidebar was called incorrectly. No id was set in the arguments array for the "side panel" sidebar. Defaulting to "sidebar-1". Manually set the id to "sidebar-1" to silence this notice and keep existing sidebar content. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 4.2.0.) in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4239

Notice: register_sidebar was called incorrectly. No id was set in the arguments array for the "footer" sidebar. Defaulting to "sidebar-2". Manually set the id to "sidebar-2" to silence this notice and keep existing sidebar content. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 4.2.0.) in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4239

Notice: Use of undefined constant add_theme_support - assumed 'add_theme_support' in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1221

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: std in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: std in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: std in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: std in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: std in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: std in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: std in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: std in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: std in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: std in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: std in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: std in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: std in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: std in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: std in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: std in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: std in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: std in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: std in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: std in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: id in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Notice: Undefined index: std in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php on line 1227

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-content/themes/wittenberg/functions.php:1227) in /home/netscrib/public_html/civilwarcavalry/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Nathan Bedford Forrest https://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=21 Bringing obscurity into focus Thu, 11 Apr 2019 15:39:26 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.0.22 By: John Scales https://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=21&cpage=1#comment-103309 Sat, 17 Sep 2016 00:33:11 +0000 http://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=21#comment-103309 I just found this comment while reading the Hess book on Bragg. In my opinion (and I have a large analysis of Forrest’s battles and campaigns forthcoming from Savas Beatie), your original post as well as some subsequent posts have a significant amount of misinformation.
I will not argue mounted infantry versus cavalry, he fought his men primarily dismounted. I would say almost always he did as he was ordered, and that was not always scouting, screening, and reconnaissance. He screened the left flank of Bragg before the Tullahoma campaign, reconning Franklin and Triune, and reported in early June that the Union cavalry had moved east to Murfreesboro and Rosecrans was getting ready to move (OR 23 pt.2, 856) – a report Bragg and Wheeler apparently ignored.
He screened the army’s right (by Bragg’s order) at Chattanooga, but Rosecrans chose to go left through Wheeler’s area. He quite correctly informed Bragg of what he could see after Chickamauga, and, had the Confederate army been in any shape to continue the attack I believe there is little doubt they would have crushed Rosecrans – but they were not.
Nowhere have I found any evidence he threatened Hood (although he certainly disagreed with him about Franklin on Winstead Hill), and the story by Cowan is almost certainly highly exaggerated if not false. You obviously confused the two stories. His relations with his commanders (Johnston, Clark, Pillow, Breckinridge, Kirby Smith, Bragg, Wheeler, Polk, S.D. Lee, Maury, and Taylor) were extremely cordial with the singular exceptions of Bragg and Wheeler.
The comment about the “first team” is incorrect. Sturgis and Grierson had twice as many troops, all experienced, at Brices Crossroads, yet they fell. Wilson had 4,800 men, some with repeaters, north of the Duck during the early part of the Nashville campaign. Forrest had 4,500 men and drove Wilson north past Spring Hill. At the end of the campaign Forrest delayed on successive positions, saving Hood’s army, against Wilson, who by that time had close to 10,000 men while Forrest, reinforced by the remnants of an infantry division, had at most half that.
Yes, at Selma he was defeated. He had around 5,000 men, half untrained militia. He was attacked by 10,000 experienced men with repeating rifles, who were aided by an Englishman Wilson had captured who gave Wilson the plan for Selma’s fortifications. On the other hand, Forrest did not know the defenses at all until the day of the battle because he had been delaying Wilson’s advance (Wilson had also captured two of his couriers, letting Wilson know Forrest’s dispositions and plans, during the delay phase.
Forrest had shortcomings and made mistakes, but his record supports Sherman and Lee in their opinions as to his value, not yours.

]]>
By: Bryan Gladstone https://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=21&cpage=1#comment-36063 Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:25:15 +0000 http://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=21#comment-36063 What a genuinely fascinating debate, but at the most fundamental level, it cannot ever reach any kind of conclusion. Forrest was no subordinate, that is for certain. He proved that in 1861 when he cut his way out of the Kentucky forts in a way that was well understood at the time. He would never have lasted in the Northern armies, but was an ideal commander in the less organised and wartorn South.
It is precisely because he was raising troops and fighting them in his and their own backyards that the Sothern hierarchy put up with him and he was so effective. And he was effective whether or not you want to compare him to Hampton, Lee, Pershing or Eisenhower.
The Civil War was the first major war in which the Industrial Revolution profoundly impacted on the traditional role of Cavalry, and that is one reason why Forrest still fascinates us. He influenced the future of militairy tactics more profoundly than the traditional plumed cavaliers and that cannot be denied.
At the same time, of course, Stewart and Hampton wonderfully well (with the exception, of course, of Stewart’s famous Pennsylvania ego trip).
Its horses for courses. Whatever we think of Forrest, we ought to respect the judgments of most of his contemporaries who fought with and against him. the speculation about the relative merits miss the point. In very different conditions Hampton and Forrest were both amongst the most effective of leaders at least in the eyes of their contemporaries.
I have never warmed to either as human beings, but both Forrest and Hampton probably did as much as anyone could have hoped for with their Calvalry troops, given the overall performance of the armies with which they served. I doubt that either could have accomplished what the other did if their roles had been switched.
Sorry for waiting so long to contribute, (Given the erudition of the earlier contributions I was afraid to waste your time.)

]]>
By: Rantings of a Civil War Historian » This Should Be an Interesting Project https://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=21&cpage=1#comment-29862 Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:49:20 +0000 http://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=21#comment-29862 […] Forrest falls in the pantheon of Civil War cavalrymen. I’ve elaborated on the issue at length here in one of my first posts on this blog. Suffice it to say that, in spite of the abuse heaped on me […]

]]>
By: The General https://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=21&cpage=1#comment-11408 Sun, 22 Apr 2007 00:03:34 +0000 http://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=21#comment-11408 Mr. Gavigan,

You’re obviously entitled to your opinion, which is fine.

However, what you don’t get to do is insult me on my own web site.

Your comment has been deleted until you learn how to behave.

The Management

]]>
By: Lee White https://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=21&cpage=1#comment-10134 Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:06:41 +0000 http://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=21#comment-10134 Lee, actually, both Forrest and Wheeler performed well at Chickamauga, both in the cavarly roles they were in prior to the battle, and in the infantry roles they performed during the battle. Additionally, Forrest notified Bragg that the Union army was retreating to Chattanooga and advised him to attack, both allegedly in person, and officially. (OR, XXX, XVII, Part IV, Page 681)

I disagree completely. Neither Wheeler or Forrest kept Bragg informed of Rosecrans movements. Indeed the entire Federal Army was across the Tennessee River and in Bragg’s rear before Bragg learned about it, and then that was from civilians. Wheeler had one regiment charged with covering fifty miles of river front and it numbered slightly over 200 men. Wheeler had the bulk of his cavalry encamped down near Rome, GA and Oxford, AL, too far away from the front.
Forrest gave bad info to Bragg as well, in regards to the Union forces leaving Chattanooga, they werent, and indeed a few hours later he runs into strong Federal resistance at Rossville Gap, where Thomas was firmly entrenched. Thats why Bragg didnt follow up on Forrest’s info.
Also as the Battle began Forrest was supposed to cover the CS advance to the LaFayette Road, not done, he actually followed behind the infantry and encamped on the night of Sept 18. Finally, in one of the fabled Forrest tales on the 19th, he sends Ectors infantry brigade into action, without having gotten permission, Ector then sent word back that he was worried about his left flank and Forrest responded he would look after his left, then Ector sent back word that he was worried about his right, and Forrest roared that he was there and he would take care of both Ector’s right and left, does anyone know what happened to Ector? His right flank was torn apart, Ector’s command was so shot up that it was held out of action on Sept 20, having lost almost every field grade officer in the brigade, Ector being wounded himself.

Lee

]]>
By: Morgan A. Mukarram https://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=21&cpage=1#comment-9309 Sun, 07 Jan 2007 03:34:56 +0000 http://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=21#comment-9309 Was general Nathan Bedford Forrest ever married to a blacj woman? Is it possible that Mary Ann Montgomery was a black woman with a very fair complexion?

]]>
By: Don H. https://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=21&cpage=1#comment-5391 Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:35:26 +0000 http://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=21#comment-5391 Hello Eric and fellow bloggers

I recently purchased a couple of your books and look forward to reading them. This portion of your blog relating to confederate cavalary has raised my interest in other lesser know leaders. I agree with your opinions about Thomas Munford and enjoyed reading them. I wanted to see if you were going to post some others. What do you think about the following:
Laurence Baker
Lunsford Lomax
James B. Gordon
John Chambliss
Pierce M.B. Young

I realize Young and Gordon have had biographies done on them(unsure of the quality). Wondered if you thought any of the others might be good subjects. One other book I have in my collection that I’ve not gotten to is THE LITTLE JEFF- Hopkins. Hopefully, will provide some good reading.
Regards
Don

]]>
By: Frank Stroupe https://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=21&cpage=1#comment-2723 Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:38:51 +0000 http://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=21#comment-2723 Valerie, you make it sound as if Forrest and Mosby acted independently in a vacuum. Each were allowed to act independently, because that is when they usually were more effective. Either man could be removed from command at any time. More than once in the OR, Bragg gives favorable comments to President Davis of Forrest’s exploits, and tells Davis “it would deprive this army of one of its greatest elements of strength to remove General Forrest, when Forrest had requested permission to form a brigade in northern Mississippi in Jul 63.

General Lee also allowed a fair amount of independence to Stuart, i.e., Stuart’s fairly useless “rides around the entire Union Army”.

At Ft. Donelson, Forrest was not only allowed to leave with his command, he was also allowed to extract many other men that did not desire to surrender, Generals Floyd and Pillow left with him. Obviously, his point was well taken. Yes, they left by stealth, as leaving before the surrender instrument was signed was against protocol.

Actually, Forrest “bought and paid for” two commands, and a significant part of a third. The first two were taken from him and given to Wheeler by Bragg…a man that Bragg well knew that Forrest despised. Of course, we don’t know if Bragg did it malitiously, or out of operational necessity. The third was when he was given command of the poorly equipped States’ Troops, local militias, and former partisan rangers in Jan 64.

Nowhere that I am aware of, was Forrest ever accused of failing to obey orders, only that he allegedly voiced his displeasure of them…at Ft. Donelson, and after Chattanooga. The alleged confrontation with Hood was not over orders, but over the needless deaths of Forrest’s soldiers at Franklin.

Lee, actually, both Forrest and Wheeler performed well at Chickamauga, both in the cavarly roles they were in prior to the battle, and in the infantry roles they performed during the battle. Additionally, Forrest notified Bragg that the Union army was retreating to Chattanooga and advised him to attack, both allegedly in person, and officially. (OR, XXX, XVII, Part IV, Page 681)

Whether the confrontation between Forrest and Bragg after Chickamauga actually took place, who knows, you either believe Dr. Cowan or not, and he waited until both Bragg and Forrest had passed on before telling the tale.

Regardless, a few months later, President Davis gave Forrest a lateral promotion, with even more independence than he previously had. (he was given command of all cavalry forces in north Mississippi, excepting those directly under the command of Gen Stephen D. Lee, and had operational control of at least two of Lee’s cavalry regiments for most of the remainder of the war)

]]>
By: Valerie Protopapas https://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=21&cpage=1#comment-710 Sun, 12 Mar 2006 00:24:04 +0000 http://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=21#comment-710 Forrest is an enigma of a sorts. He was far more ‘independent’ than even such ‘independent’ commands as Mosby. At a recent symposium in Richmond, some little effort was made to delineate Forrest and from what I learned, it seemed as if Forrest was fighting the war more ‘independently’ than anyone else. For instance, when engaged in a battle after which the Confederate military commander wished to surrender his forces, Forrest said something to the effect that he hadn’t come all that way to surrender – and took his men off by stealth. Forrest’s desire to ‘obey’ his military superiors was directly proportionate to his own determinations vis a vie the orders they gave. If he agreed, he obeyed; if he didn’t, he was liable to find something else to do that suited him better.

As well, Forrest bought and paid for his command and, I guess, believed that he was the final arbiter of their destiny – which, in fact, he proved to be after the surrender of the Confederacy. In the same way, Mosby created his command – a much smaller one than Forrest’s – and so chose after Appomattox to disband rather than surrender the 43rd Battalion. However, Mosby never failed to obey orders given to him by his recognized superiors – Stuart and Lee – and, unlike Forrest, was a commensurate commander of cavalry in the role of scouting, raiding and intelligence gathering.

Both Forrest and Mosby saw a role for the cavalry that ‘went against the grain’ of the more accepted military ideals. The thing is, they went in different directions: Forrest went to a larger role – a sort of ‘mounted infantry’ as Mr. Wittenberg notes – while Mosby went for a smaller role – what we now call, Special Forces operations.

However, I don’t think that any evaluation of Forrest is really complete without taking into account how very badly W.T. Sherman wanted him exterminated even to bankrupting the national Treasury. Whether Forrest was cavalry or mounted infantry, apparently to Sherman he was a colossal pain in the nether region and – like Mosby – remained so until the end of the war.

V.P.

]]>
By: Lee White https://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=21&cpage=1#comment-445 Fri, 27 Jan 2006 18:53:14 +0000 http://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=21#comment-445 I agree with Eric, Forrest has taken on the mantle almost akin to Robin Hood. Forrest performed very poorly for Bragg in the Chickamauga campaign, the same can be said of Wheeler too. If the Cavalry is the eyes and ears of an army, then the Army of Tennessee was blind and deaf. Also, a there is some doubt as to either of the Forrest confrontations actually occured. There is only one account of the Bragg fight, and that was wrote years after the war and never supported by anyone else, also given Bragg’s strict adherance to the rules, Bragg would have had Forrest in irons. As a side note, Bragg was not as universally dispised as most would belive, he did have his supporters in the army and they were split pretty even with his enemies.

Lee

]]>