02 October 2007 by Published in: Blogging 4 comments

On October 10, 2005, I made one of my first posts on this blog. It shows up as p. 23 on the blog. By comparison, this is p. 579. That post dealt with all of the reasons why I’m no fan of Nathan Bedford Forrest.

What amazes me about it is that people continue to post comments to this particular post two years later. I had a new comment posted there tonight. A number of them have contained nasty personal attacks on me just because I don’t buy into their hero worship of Forrest. Each of those has been deleted because I don’t allow personal attacks on me on my own blog.

To give the latest poster credit, he was courteous and rational in his discussion. Thank you for your civility.

Let me just say a couple of things about this…

1. NOTHING that any of you say is going to change my mind about this issue. I appreciate the effort. I really do. However, I’ve spent years pondering it, and I’m quite set in my opinion. There’s not much point in trying to convince me–you’re going to fail and you’re going to waste your breath in the process.

2. That a two-year old post continues to generate comments is proof positive that Forrest is an extremely controversial figure that continues to polarize opinions. I don’t ever see that particular trend changing.

3. The ferocity of the Forrest supporters is really amazing. I can’t think of another Civil War figure who generates such ferocious responses as does Nathan Bedford Forrest. Why is that?

As I said, this whole thing just flabbergasts me. I can only hope that this ends sooner or later…However, I don’t have any reason to expect that it will…..

Scridb filter

Comments

  1. Dave Smith
    Wed 03rd Oct 2007 at 8:20 am

    Gee, I dunno, Eric. The George Thomas supporters can be pretty stuck in their ways as well.

    Dave

  2. Art Bergeron
    Wed 03rd Oct 2007 at 8:29 am

    Eric, I know you realize that some of the fervor over Forrest is a result of the vicious attacks on him. My views on him have moved back and forth over the years.

    Art

  3. Wed 03rd Oct 2007 at 11:32 am

    Eric as one who has a great deal of respect for Forrest in his final years (I must stress that period) and as one who has both spoken and written on the subject of his spiritual transformation, I totally understand BOTH sides of the issues surrounding ‘The Wizard’ and I am often bothered by the lack of perspective people have. Forrest polarizes people in so many ways. I ask why must we always take sides? I say admit his racist nature, acknowledge his ferocity in battle, and appreciate his devotion as a Christian in his golden years. The man was a complex figure to say the least – but there is plenty of contradiction that made up his legacy. It’s not an issue of taking sides or exalting him in the extremes (wither way). There is no denying the conflict of service and sin in this man’s life. We must recognize him for who he was. Nothing more and nothing less. (JMO)

  4. Thu 18th Oct 2007 at 11:08 am

    He deserves study if nothing else.

Comments are closed.

Copyright © Eric Wittenberg 2011, All Rights Reserved
Powered by WordPress