<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poor Decisions by Alfred Pleasonton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civilwarcavalry.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=538</link>
	<description>The worldview of a Civil War historian, publisher, and practicing lawyer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 15:09:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=538&#038;cpage=1#comment-13255</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civilwarcavalry.com/?p=538#comment-13255</guid>
		<description>Eric,

It makes for an interesting comparison with the use of Union cavalry during Lee&#039;s retreat from Petersburg.  I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s a fair comparison, given the state of Lee&#039;s army coming out of the siege lines and the strength and equipment of his cavalry at that point.

Was it much different than cavalry pursuit of Lee after Antietam, though?  Funny, McClellan always seems to get the blame there, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,</p>
<p>It makes for an interesting comparison with the use of Union cavalry during Lee&#8217;s retreat from Petersburg.  I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s a fair comparison, given the state of Lee&#8217;s army coming out of the siege lines and the strength and equipment of his cavalry at that point.</p>
<p>Was it much different than cavalry pursuit of Lee after Antietam, though?  Funny, McClellan always seems to get the blame there, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
